This page publicly lists the categories of sources roksolanapyrtko.ceo uses for its commercial real estate analysis in Argentina, Uruguay and Panama, and explains how the most volatile figures are re-verified before each publication. For the full editorial process, see Editorial Methodology.
Official sources and national statistics
- Argentina: INDEC (national statistics), BCRA (monetary policy and interest rates), ARCA (tax regime).
- Uruguay: INE (national statistics), BCU (monetary policy), Uruguay XXI (foreign investment and promotion).
- Panama: INEC (statistics and census), ACP (Canal traffic and operations), ASEP (regulated public services).
Real estate consultancies
For commercial real estate market data — vacancy, absorption, asking rent, yields by segment, new-stock pipeline — this editorial relies on public reports from JLL, CBRE, Newmark and Colliers, always citing the report and the quarter a figure originates from.
Additional source categories
- Legal and regulatory framework: official texts of laws and decrees (for example, the repeal of Argentina’s rental law, the RIGI regime, Panama’s Territorial Tax), not uncontrasted third-party interpretations.
- Specialised economic press: used as contextual reference, never as the sole source for a market figure.
- Verifiable corporate data: investment announcements with an identifiable public source (official statements, public records), not market rumours.
How volatile data is re-verified
Certain indicators change frequently and go stale fast: interest rates, exchange rates, segment yields and quarterly vacancy. Before each publication or relevant update, these figures are checked again against the most recent primary source available; an article does not automatically reuse a figure from an earlier piece without re-verifying it. When the available data is not current as of the publication date, the article states that explicitly along with the data’s origin date.
What is not used as a source
We do not cite as a source of market data: anonymous publications without verifiable authorship, forum or social-media estimates, or figures repeated across multiple outlets without any of them identifying the primary origin. When there is reasonable doubt about a figure’s origin, this editorial prefers to omit it rather than publish it unsupported.